[x] User Info
Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

[x] Main Menu

[x] Coppermine Stats
coppermine
 Albums: 1
 Pictures: 3
  · Views: 2539
  · Votes: 0
  · Comments: 5

Q&A Instructions
A glitch, after clicking on New Topic link below, you will the same Q&A and Difference blocks. Look below Diff block to see "Questions for Members and Yes/No persons" header and the "New Topic" button.

1. Copy-n-paste what your question is about from the Member's forum, someones Yes/No forum, or any Member Q&A Dialogue.

2. Then click this link: hit New Topic button and paste your copy in the New Topic box. Remember "new topic" box is below.

3. Put members nicl-(x) number, e.g. nicl-1 or Yes/No persons name in Subject rectangle followed by the subject of question. For a long question, add more at top of Topic box.

4. Remember, an "I agree" or a "this is my last response" ends your part in the dialogue, and the other person gets the last word.

Finally, read and reread the Q&A procedures. They are meant to treat both sides of a Dialogue impartially.


Difference in Forums

1. In the "open to all who register" Community Forums you do not have to answer questions, you can use an anonymous handle, start any topic, respond or not respond as you please.

2. In the Questions for Members forums you have to also register as a member and accept the Member agreements to answer questions from anyone about what you put in your Member Forum.

3.In Yes/No forums, you have to agree to answer questions from anyone about your specific Yes/No only.

4. To be notified of replies in Community Forums check "watch this topic" below topic entry box.



How full member Q&A forums treat both questioner
and Member-Yes/No persons impartially.

How we Theory Makers view reality is theories premise

Author Message
Dan
Site Admin


Joined: Dec 31, 1969
Posts: 282
Location: USA

PostPost subject: How we Theory Makers view reality is theories premise
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:58 am

A scientist(a life form) makes a theory which is used to explain "How the Universe Works" back to all people = rational sentient life forms. Ergo, since a theory begins and ends with us, "What Are We and How Do We Unconsciously Perceive Reality?" is crux to creating real 'objective' theories for all to rely upon.i.e. How we theory makers(life forms) perceive reality is the only possible actual 'point of view' theories ARE made from.

For life forms that 'point of view' is obvious: We like to stay alive = we maximize time alive. Ergo, this raises this question, "How do we unconsciously MEASURE how any possible change in our "particular circumstances of time and place"(Hayek) increases or decreases our time alive?"; i.e. "What do we measure value to ourselves with?".

CONCLUSION: But present scientists do not know what "Measure of Value" they as life forms unconsciously use to organize all their perceptions of reality with, therefore it is impossible for them to construct accurate theories of how the universe and we 'life forms' work.

IMPLICATION: That can only mean, discovering what "Measure of Value" all life forms use essential for doing science and keeping life going on Earth. It would be the biggest scientific discovery since soft ice cream.

THE DISCOVERY

I figured out what we = all life forms 'measure of value' is in 1984 after I demonstrated why Ronald Coase was wrong in
his paper "The Problem of Social Cost" Journal of Law & Economics, October 1960. It is called Coase's Theorem. In it he asked the question "Who do we make pay for causing a cost?"; by inference, he was actually asking, "Who does our 'conserved universe' make pay?". Guess what the answer is, "You poop it, the universe makes you scoop it in the end.", what a surprise.

www.no1stcostlist.com/...sid=9.html

By showing what Coase's logical error was, we can see how to proceed to an "Objective" premise for a real Grand unification Theory (GUT) that shows how the universe works from our own special point of view, i.e. "own time cost minimizing life forms" = spirits trying to keep their life forms alive forever in a 'conserved', but growing universe.

It ain't easy, let me assure you.

DEFINITIONS:

Objective = we both agree on what we see using our properly working sensory apparatus.

For scientists this means, if we can not possibly perceive = test our predictions, it ain't science. However, just because it is hard to figure out a test, does not mean it can not be done, but the test better be 'theoretically' possible.

Conserved = We start with ONE unit of everything; so when we get done slicing and dicing all the pieces of what our theory is trying to explain, the result still adds up to ONE. So when we see a 'Discrepancy', we know that nothing is lost, just not 'accounted for'.

_________________
"I swear to speak honestly and seek the truth when I use the No 1st Cost List public record."
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Social Connect! [x]

Seeing Ourselves [x]

Forums Last posts [x]

Latest Articles [x]

Disconnect Links [x]


COPYRIGHT 2005 No 1st Cost List, Patent Pending
The logos and trademarks used on this site are the property of their respective owners.
We are not responsible for any information and comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster.
Unless you charge above actual copying expense, you may read, copy, reprint, incorporate or pass on to others in any form the material put on the
No 1st Cost List public record for public and private benefit.
When charging above actual copying expenses, except for accepted 'fair use', you must arrange terms of compensation with the author(s).
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy