[x] User Info
Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password
Security CodeSecurity Code
Type Code

[x] Main Menu
 
Main Pages
 
Forums & Pictures
 
Find Out
 
About Us
 
Surveys & Archive
 
Members options
 
Personal

Q&A Instructions

1. Copy-n-paste what your question is about from the Member's forum, someones
Yes/No forum, or any Member Q&A Dialogue into Question & Answer Dialogue forum;
then hit New Topic button and paste your copy in the New Topic box.

2. Put members nicl-(x) number, e.g. nicl-1 or Yes/No persons name in Subject rectangle
followed by the subject of question. For a long question, add more at top of Topic box.

3. Remember you take turns, checking an "I agree" or a "this is my last response"
ends your part in the dialogue, and the other person gets the last word.

4. the Q&A procedures are meant to treat both sides of a Dialogue impartially.
Finally, to open another popup, close the old one.

Why must scientists practice Nullius In Verba?

Author Message
Dan
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 01, 1970
Posts: 363
Location: USA
PostPost subject: Why must scientists practice Nullius In Verba?
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2017 9:00 am

12-23-17 Nullius In Verba, "Take nobodies word for it" is the motto of the Royal Society, the first modern scientific society established by Charles the second of England in 1652.

7-1-18 revision with a second fundamental added conclusion to 3-18-18 addition with explanatory example.

I had concluded that 'Take Nobody's Word For It.' is not obvious to most people. 'Nullius In Verba" means that a scientific prediction must be be proven or falsified by "objective" tests done by other independent people.

Second conclusion: I just realized that expeditiously giving public credit turned out to be the logical necessity upon which objective science rests, otherwise you can not know who's word you are taking.
.
In short, giving public credit is the bedrock practice required for scientists to claim they actually practices Nullius In Verba.



For example, the assertion that rising CO2 levels cause global warming means the fundamental premise of scientific analysis must hold: Causes always occur before effects.

In fact, the Beer-Lambert-Bouguer Law directly proves otherwise. It is the basis for spectrographic analysis and predicts how much any form of gas like CO2 can absorb of any form of light like infrared radiation. This Law predicts that CO2 stops absorbing infrared radiation at under 100 parts per million in our atmosphere.

Over 100 ice core samples going back 800,000 years prove that temperatures always rise by 800 plus years before CO2 levels rise during dozens of inter-glacials; and over 800 years after temperatures start falling, then CO2 levels start falling. Ergo CO2 levels are an effect not a cause.

Desert plants in particular love rising CO2 levels as it lets them use water more efficiently. Already confirmed by NASA satellites for the Sahara.

Bottom line; asserting that everyone believes it does not make it true. Only objective replicable tests done by independent people do.




Sir Isaac Newton was the Royal Society president from 1702 to 1727. Hmm, he probably would be considered a real scientist. Yet he refused to give Leibniz, the co=discoverer of the Calculus credit.

Wanting credit and honestly giving credit to others is a test for human nature, one that scientists, above all, must consciously not give in to.

The reason that 'Nullius in Verba' is the Royal Societies motto is because it states the method scientists must use to prove their assertions. Take Nobodies Word For It can only exist when public credit is given to who discovered the confirmed proof, otherwise you can not know who's word you are taking.

In short, giving public credit is the bedrock practice required for scientists to claim they actually practices Nullius In Verba.

_________________
"I swear to speak honestly and seek the truth when I use the No 1st Cost List public record."


Last edited by Dan on Sat Aug 24, 2019 10:40 am; edited 1 time in total

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index Prevent A-M debt Hitting Sun
Page 1 of 1
All times are UTC



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Seeing Ourselves [x]

Forums Last posts [x]

Latest Articles [x]

Disconnect Links [x]
This URL is for those of you who deny the E-Ts existence.

Click on "evidence" at SiriusDisclosure.com The Disclosure Project has over 800 govt witnesses who swore before Congress to their direct E-T contacts.

This climate url speaks to how corrupt much of our scientific establishment has become.

Why rising CO2 levels Can NOT cause global warming.

Cimate Fraud Whistleblower Rewards Program

Why is handling the massive scientific disagreement with the AGW(Anthropogenic Global Warming = (man caused) proponents crucial to disconnecting Earth's Anti-Matter debt?

Our leaders and thus most of you will not seek the truth about our real place in the universe. Why is explained by ignorance and self service. Until our society openly deals with this easy to resolve scientific disagreement, I must conclude we will not act to prevent Earth from being vaporized.

These links deal directly with How to Prevent our Sun from exploding.

How do we prevent our Sun from exploding July 16, 2024?

How to find the two conjunction asteroids shown in the "Missing Earth" crop circle.


This math is required.
How to use a circle to relate 'e' to Phi.


Confirming objective reports.
National UFO Reporting Center

Crop Circle Connector


2-4-2017 Needed A-M debt Disconnection Tools, Measurements & Must Do's

HOW can we get these tests DONE?

Contact Congress

The Latest Changes Made To Site

Visitors [x]
We have received
7833582
page views since
April 27, 2005