REGISTER Log On/Off
Forums Last posts
Last 10 Forum Messages
Forums & Pictures
Surveys & Archive
We Don't Censor, We Record
Einstein\'s Missed Implication\' TEST Shows Relativity\'s Base Reference Frame
Special Relativity\'s error: Einstein and present physicists did not measure speed as a percentage of the speed of light, Einsteins posited constant with respect to all observers. Special relativity used the Lorentz transformations to make this prediction that observers starting with synchronized clocks moving at same speed would each see the others clock slow as they were separated by speed. They only looked in one direction as c itself had no empirical measure, even though one does exist: [url=http://www.no1stcostlist.com/News/article/sid=16.html]\'Einstein\'s Missed Implication\' TEST Shows Relativity\'s Base Reference Frame[/url]
Original MT: Equation clue: In special relativity when two observers start from same location with synchronized clocks and share the same gravitational acceleration; then when one goes faster than the other measured as percentage of c, the faster persons clock goes slower and they see the slower ones clock also go slower. When astronauts return from the space station their clock has slowed down with respect to Earth clocks. Obviously despite seeing the Earth clock go slower, it did not. BUT when we use the same starting conditions and then let one observer be accelerated by gravity like to a neutron star, there clock also slows, but it sees other non accelerated clock speed up????? Resolving this discrepancy gives us the field over which the Moebius geometry coordinate system explains. It answers the question, Why is c a constant with respect to all observers? Einsteins crucial unanswered question.
30-Oct-2010 17:22:1 ','10-26-19 equation clue difference between relativity clocks last edit 10-26-2919 is constant with respect all observers e any observer like astronaut orbit sees their clock going c ticks per second thus astronaut sees earth clock slow down account for difference of speeds g general relativity says you are accelerated g clock slows down with respect higher gravity well observer all cases the observers clock ticks c ticks per second thus seeing other objects moving a different c requires observer see other object of clock speed adjusted accordingly test pointed out below even though astronaut orbit sees earth clock slow with respect his clock when astronaut returns earth sees that earth clocks were fact moving faster revised 3-10-17 written 10-30-10 summary question why two observers one going faster than the other both see the others clock slow down special relativity however gravitationally accelerated observer sees the slower observers clock faster and the slower observer sees the accelerated observers clock slow in special relativity 3-10-17 tests comparing two synchronized clocks one earth and the other low orbit confirm that the faster moving clock the one orbit indeed slowed down ergo the clock earth ticks faster than the one orbit they are moving different speeds does observer higher and faster orbits see the clock earth slower general relativity predicts answer we see clocks higher geosynchronous orbits tick faster apparently combining the two confirmed observations verify special and general relativity 11-1-10 special relativity error einstein and present physicists did not measure speed a percentage the speed light einsteins posited constant with respect all observers special relativity used the lorentz transformations make this prediction that observers starting with synchronized clocks moving same speed would each see the others clock slow they were separated speed they only looked one direction c itself had empirical measure even though one does exist einstein missed implication test shows relativity base reference frame original equation clue special relativity when two observers start from same location with synchronized clocks and share the same gravitational acceleration then when one goes faster than the other measured percentage c the faster persons clock goes slower and they see the slower ones clock also slower when astronauts return from the space station their clock has slowed down with respect earth clocks obviously despite seeing the earth clock slower did not but when use the same starting conditions and then let one observer accelerated gravity like a neutron star there clock also slows but sees other non accelerated clock speed resolving this discrepancy gives the field over which the moebius geometry coordinate system explains answers the question why c constant with respect all observers einsteins crucial unanswered question 30-oct-2010 22'
We have received8167419
page views since
April 27, 2005
Proof E-Ts do secret business with USA govt.
Click on "evidence" at SiriusDisclosure.com The Disclosure Project has over 800 USA govt witnesses who swore publicly before Congress they dealt face to face with E-Ts
This climate url speaks to how corrupt much of our scientific establishment has become.
Why rising CO2 levels Can NOT cause global warming.
Cimate Fraud Whistleblower Rewards Program
Why is handling the massive scientific disagreement with the AGW(Anthropogenic Global Warming = (man caused) proponents crucial to disconnecting Earth's Anti-Matter debt?
Our leaders and thus most of you will not seek the truth about our real place in the universe. Why is explained by ignorance and self service. Until our society openly deals with this easy to resolve scientific disagreement, I must conclude we will not act to prevent Earth from being vaporized.
These links deal directly with How to Prevent our Sun from exploding.
How do we prevent our Sun from exploding July 16, 2024
How to find the two conjunction asteroids shown in the "Missing Earth" crop circle.
This math is required.
How to use a circle to relate 'e' to Phi.
Confirming objective reports.
National UFO Reporting Center
Crop Circle Connector
2-4-2017 Needed A-M debt Disconnection Tools, Measurements & Must Do's
HOW can we get these tests DONE?
The Latest Changes Made To Site
"Missing Earth" & Barbary Castle showing Earth vaporized:
Message History Dan: "The police state and tyranny is brought to you by those willing to follow commands, regardless of the morality of the command. Tyrants can’t have power without people willing to enforce the tyranny. If there are no order followers, there are no orders." Mac Slavo SHTFfan.com
Dan: "Thus, in the interim, our best hope may be an ancient legal doctrine that extends back to Roman law in the sixth century. “Volenti non fit injuria” means “no wrong is done to one who consents,” and it became the solid foundation for what we know today as “assumption of risk.” The doctrine encapsulates the concept of personal responsibility and choice. Thus, any economic opening precisely requires not liability but choice." Zero Hedge by Jonathan Turley 2020-05-10
Dan: The only kinds of fights worth fighting are those you’re going to lose, because somebody has to fight them and lose and lose and lose until someday, somebody who believes as you do wins. I. F. Stone
Dan: "When we wish to correct with advantage, and to show another that he errs, we must notice from what side he views the matter, for on that side it is usually true, and admit that truth to him, but reveal to him the side on which it is false. He is satisfied with that, for he sees that he was not mistaken, and that he only failed to see all sides. Now, no one is offended at not seeing everything; but one does not like to be mistaken, and that perhaps arises from the fact that man naturally cannot see everything, and that naturally he cannot err in the side he looks at, since the perceptions of our senses are always true." Pascal
Dan: "There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes." John Swinton, preeminent New York journalist, at a press banquet,1880
Dan: The question is stark. "Will we ACT to become civilized?": "Why would a free people endowed by our creator with unalienable rights tolerate our public servants, hired and elected, ever deliberately lying or negligently withholding relevant facts from us?" To allow them to do so is a choice. Clearly the voting majority of us has tolerated our public servants lying to us up to now. That can only mean most of you don't want to take on the duties required to create a real free civilization of equals before the law. Will we choose to stop public lies from leaders? Deeds speak, talks cheap. Dan Alter
Dan: " Money is supposed to measure the profit of a voluntary exchange between two actors with productive advantages in different goods or services." Tom Luengo---
Dan: Robert F. Kennedy, delivering an extemporaneous eulogy to Martin Luther King, Jr., the evening of April 4, 1968, in Indianapolis, Indiana, said, “Aeschylus wrote: ‘In our sleep, pain that cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart and in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom through the awful grace of God.’”
Dan: Lets restate Planck's statement below as a question: " How do we now unconsciously and thus automatically organize our perceptions from the universe we live in?" Dan,.....Thus scientifically discovering and objectively showing how we we automatically organize our perceptions is the fundamental scientific discovery required to understand and explain how our universe works objectively using now visible causes and effects upon ourselves.
Only Registered Users can POST