REGISTER Log On/Off
Forums Last posts
Last 10 Forum Messages
Forums & Pictures
Surveys & Archive
We Don't Censor, We Record
I am not a climate warming denier, I am a scientist, and those who push CO2 caused global warming are both factually and theoretically WRONG! Their refusal to answer objections is scientifically dishonest, while going back and deliberately changing original temperature measurements makes them NOT scientists, but propagandists, and in the case of using public monies to falsify data, criminals.
Are any of you who say CO2 causes global warming, willing to answer my charges in public on the N1CL? Challenge me on the record. Let\'s see whose data and theory backing up the data wins.
Yes we can do real science together, it starts with admitting when you are wrong in public after you have published. Doing that is the essence of being a dogooder = a scientist. Doing good absolutely requires we get our facts and reasoningstraight, especially when we are dealing with the lives of everyone on Earth.
Until we actually publicly and expeditiously resolve my prediction that CO2 can not cause global warming as a greenhouse gas, we can not call ourselves an honest society that actually does real science.
','the principles governing scientist behavior revised 11-25-16 rearranged order and added the fifth principle 7-22-17 edit for clarity using whats wrong with your predictions improve them 7-18-17 minor editing for clarity mis-spelling etc 2-03-18 added preamble 2-05-18 edited preamble adding the conclusion or worse and unfortunately more frequently bought and paid for 2-25-18 changed above phrase read or worse and unfortunately all too often they show they are bought and paid for preamble scientist on public voyage discovery once you can frame question can answer yet then you step across the boundary into the vast unknown you only have your purpose find the common objective causal link that answers the question and explains its implications these kind answers are called natural laws when you start you don know what the answer you just know there an answer this purpose means you must use self admitted incorrect falsifiable predictions yourself and others can test your predictions the beginning you will almost always wrong graciously and thankfully admit improve your hypothesis and persist until you figure out instead now treat science and public discourse a gladiatorial contest many people and most phds act though their version reality must true and they don't have answer anyone else objective disagreements instead they ignore call you names when pushed this behavior means are not honest truth seeking society my deeds have shown that use publicly admitted wrong predictions make fundamental scientific discoveries when you claim be truth seeker and that what real scientist then there only one way prove you actually seek the public truth use the n1cl anyone who claims be scientist and won answer public challenges from anyone not real scientist instead they show they are afraid stand for the public truth worse and unfortunately all too often they show they are bought and paid for below are the five principles purpose defines methods the advance science above all rests publicly resolving with objective evidence disagreements about how our universe causally works therefore these operating principles must regulate scientists behavior objective all can potentially see measure the same data e takes least two us create objective fact g scientific laws must meet even higher standard they can potentially verified any honest competent observer g the speed light a vacuum always mcc you must a honest eyewitness create scientific facts first once you find question can not explain causally you must predictions organized cause and effect the purpose science to predict how our universe works down its most basic level using objective measures cause and effect all can see used after you have enough data take guess hypothesis then measure what sticks adjust your prediction admitting whats wrong with your hypothesis using the difference between what measurements you predicted and what you actually measured improve the hypothesis then rinse and repeat until you get right perfect means will never run out work amazing how many phds think not admitting when they are wrong allowed they this ignoring adjusting contradictory data because contradicts the theoretical dogma they were indoctrinated with old story much worse offends who writes their paychecks older story second amazing how many people especially many scientists make this mistake cause always occurs before effect effect after its cause e every ice core sample from greenland and antarctica about 100 going back 800 000 years shows that temperatures rise least 800 years before co2 levels start rising and co2 levels start falling 800 plus years after temperature levels start falling ergo co2 an effect not cause just the beer-lambert-bouguer lawpredicts co2 contribution global warming a constant is infrared sponge very limited capacity the beer-lambert-bouguer law predicts that any given volume gas chemical some parts per million the absorption spectrum the gas chemical will absorb of the radiation passing through the given volume double the ppm you capture double again 5 you can double the distance and get the same effect ergo any combination distance doubles and ppm doubles that add to six and you can absorb any more for co2 its ppm and less than cubic meter distance thus 100 ppm less can absorb any more infrared our atmosphere why co2 stops absorbing infrared below 400 ppm third your data the measurements are sacrosanct fudging lying about the data the only mortal scientific sin all make mistakes and measurements are easier screw than most people realize especially statistics when you discover mistake admit asap four since science for all us you must give credit those who discover first and publish first while all involved publishing and challenging must courteously answer anyone public disagreement with your facts and reasoning credit and courtesy together five last but not least real scientists challenge publicly false and incorrect scientific assertions anyone am not climate warming denier am scientist and those who push co2 caused global warming are both factually and theoretically wrong their refusal answer objections scientifically dishonest while going back and deliberately changing original temperature measurements makes them not scientists but propagandists and the case using public monies falsify data criminals are any you who say co2 causes global warming willing answer charges public the n1cl challenge on the record let see whose data and theory backing the data wins yes can real science together starts with admitting when you are wrong public after you have published doing that the essence being dogooder scientist doing good absolutely requires get our facts and reasoning straight especially when are dealing with the lives everyone earth until actually publicly and expeditiously resolve prediction that co2 can not cause global warming a greenhouse gas can not call ourselves honest society that actually does real science.
We have received8167419
page views since
April 27, 2005
Proof E-Ts do secret business with USA govt.
Click on "evidence" at SiriusDisclosure.com The Disclosure Project has over 800 USA govt witnesses who swore publicly before Congress they dealt face to face with E-Ts
This climate url speaks to how corrupt much of our scientific establishment has become.
Why rising CO2 levels Can NOT cause global warming.
Cimate Fraud Whistleblower Rewards Program
Why is handling the massive scientific disagreement with the AGW(Anthropogenic Global Warming = (man caused) proponents crucial to disconnecting Earth's Anti-Matter debt?
Our leaders and thus most of you will not seek the truth about our real place in the universe. Why is explained by ignorance and self service. Until our society openly deals with this easy to resolve scientific disagreement, I must conclude we will not act to prevent Earth from being vaporized.
These links deal directly with How to Prevent our Sun from exploding.
How do we prevent our Sun from exploding July 16, 2024
How to find the two conjunction asteroids shown in the "Missing Earth" crop circle.
This math is required.
How to use a circle to relate 'e' to Phi.
Confirming objective reports.
National UFO Reporting Center
Crop Circle Connector
2-4-2017 Needed A-M debt Disconnection Tools, Measurements & Must Do's
HOW can we get these tests DONE?
The Latest Changes Made To Site
"Missing Earth" & Barbary Castle showing Earth vaporized:
Message History Dan: "The police state and tyranny is brought to you by those willing to follow commands, regardless of the morality of the command. Tyrants can’t have power without people willing to enforce the tyranny. If there are no order followers, there are no orders." Mac Slavo SHTFfan.com
Dan: "Thus, in the interim, our best hope may be an ancient legal doctrine that extends back to Roman law in the sixth century. “Volenti non fit injuria” means “no wrong is done to one who consents,” and it became the solid foundation for what we know today as “assumption of risk.” The doctrine encapsulates the concept of personal responsibility and choice. Thus, any economic opening precisely requires not liability but choice." Zero Hedge by Jonathan Turley 2020-05-10
Dan: The only kinds of fights worth fighting are those you’re going to lose, because somebody has to fight them and lose and lose and lose until someday, somebody who believes as you do wins. I. F. Stone
Dan: "When we wish to correct with advantage, and to show another that he errs, we must notice from what side he views the matter, for on that side it is usually true, and admit that truth to him, but reveal to him the side on which it is false. He is satisfied with that, for he sees that he was not mistaken, and that he only failed to see all sides. Now, no one is offended at not seeing everything; but one does not like to be mistaken, and that perhaps arises from the fact that man naturally cannot see everything, and that naturally he cannot err in the side he looks at, since the perceptions of our senses are always true." Pascal
Dan: "There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes." John Swinton, preeminent New York journalist, at a press banquet,1880
Dan: The question is stark. "Will we ACT to become civilized?": "Why would a free people endowed by our creator with unalienable rights tolerate our public servants, hired and elected, ever deliberately lying or negligently withholding relevant facts from us?" To allow them to do so is a choice. Clearly the voting majority of us has tolerated our public servants lying to us up to now. That can only mean most of you don't want to take on the duties required to create a real free civilization of equals before the law. Will we choose to stop public lies from leaders? Deeds speak, talks cheap. Dan Alter
Dan: " Money is supposed to measure the profit of a voluntary exchange between two actors with productive advantages in different goods or services." Tom Luengo---
Dan: Robert F. Kennedy, delivering an extemporaneous eulogy to Martin Luther King, Jr., the evening of April 4, 1968, in Indianapolis, Indiana, said, “Aeschylus wrote: ‘In our sleep, pain that cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart and in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom through the awful grace of God.’”
Dan: Lets restate Planck's statement below as a question: " How do we now unconsciously and thus automatically organize our perceptions from the universe we live in?" Dan,.....Thus scientifically discovering and objectively showing how we we automatically organize our perceptions is the fundamental scientific discovery required to understand and explain how our universe works objectively using now visible causes and effects upon ourselves.
Only Registered Users can POST