5-15-18, 1st draft 3-12-18, 2nd 4-05-18, 3rd 5-10-18
First a definition of how scientists define "objective". That is why Nullius in Verba, "take nobodies word for it." must apply to anyone's claimed scientific assertions like mine.
Objective facts are created when two or more us can agree we see or measure the same things.
For example, scientific facts mean any of us can potentially verify them for ourselves.
A scientist or reporter must be a honest eyewitness to create scientific facts and real news.
Ergo, the facts in or implied by truthful statements are relevant and as accurate as possible.
Science is a maximization logic. Scientist try to maximize, make a perfect objective description of how the basic laws of how our universe work, logically ordered by the premise that causes always occur before effects with respect to ourselves.
Economics is the logical science that describes how a maximization logic works when you assume a universal measure of personal profit. Economics only problem is they don't know what "The objective measure pf personal value(profit) all life forms use to maximize their personal time alive.
Ergo, once the actual objective = see it for yourself measure of personal value is discovered, then Economics becomes the mother logic of science.
The Objective Measure Of Our General Welfare
This demonstration starts with a stringent criticism of how Economics is now practiced. This criticism shows that economists scientists can't do "objective" science, because they explicitly say economic actors(life forms) use a subjective = "can not see", measure of profit. Since personal own profit maximization is what drives economic analysis, then an admitted 'no objective measure of personal profit' means economists explicitly admit they don't do objective science, and worse, they do not make discovering what 'objective measure of personal profit' all life forms use, the fundamental quest for economic scientists.
Making this discovery is accomplished by showing that all life forms, usually unconsciously, try to maximize what keeps them alive and wealthy. When this "objective" maximizing blade of the shear of analysis is combined with an "objective" minimizing fixed input shear, then we can describe how any set of objective physical circumstances affect our time alive, both individually and collectively.
In short, We use exchange to minimize "the time we spend" to maximize the Goods & Services Exchanged(G&S XCed) that keep us alive and wealthy.
Some examples will be used to show how this scissors of analysis works in practice, and then I will apply this analytic tool to Earth's present set circumstances. It works as a mirror that shows us how we are doing at maximizing everyone's time alive via XC. Right now, some improvement seems possible and doable, given most of you want to be honest. That sounds like fun, doesn’t it?
Why can't economists claim to be scientists now?