REGISTER Log On/Off
Forums & Pictures
Surveys & Archive
Suggested N1CL Registration Agreement. Comments Please.
Joined: Jan 01, 1970
|Post subject: Suggested N1CL Registration Agreement. Comments Please.
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 11:05 pm
This agreement is hopefully designed protect free speech and eliminate N1CL legal liability for its users speech. This means we do not monitor peoples speech, but instead react to complaints from any reader or user. We provide the record, you provide the speech.
So What Do You Think About Agreement Below?
I am leaving these changes to registration agreement here for Comments and Suggestions. Should we Change User Agreement to read:</span> "You agree that any entry submitted to the N1CL Public Record by you is meant to be subject to public comment and criticism, to which you can respond in any way you decide is best;
Therefore, you agree you are wholly responsible for all consequences of your speech on the N1CL Public Record, legal or otherwise;
Therefore, until a court recognized by the N1CL legally orders that your speech is illegal, OR someone points out that previous legal precedent defines it as illegal; OR someone complains to the N1CL administrators about your entries being massively rude, discourteous, and objectionable to truth seeking Public discourse; the N1CL administrators will not edit, monitor, delete, or ban your entries on the N1CL Public Record;
Therefore, you agree the N1CL can edit, monitor, delete, or ban your posts after someone makes a complaint about your entries and N1CL administrators uphold the complaint, giving reasons;
Should you disagree with the administrators decisions, you agree to use the N1CL arbitration mechanism to resolve your objection to the administrators decisions about your entries.".
Comment on above user agreement. Keeping free speech is fundamental to the N1CL. I think the above agreement does that by separating the "List administrators from the List's entries by anyone. The N1CL can not be legally liable for anyone's speech on the List record. Yet, of course, some people will deliberately try to disrupt public discourse and must be stopped. I think the above agreement strikes the proper balance, but we can let Beta decide.
"I swear to speak honestly and seek the truth when I use the No 1st Cost List public record."
Last edited by Dan on Tue Dec 31, 2019 11:33 pm; edited 1 time in total
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Forums Last posts
Last 10 Forum Messages
Proof E-Ts do secret business with USA govt.
Click on "evidence" at SiriusDisclosure.com The Disclosure Project has over 800 USA govt witnesses who swore publicly before Congress they dealt face to face with E-Ts
This climate url speaks to how corrupt much of our scientific establishment has become.
Why rising CO2 levels Can NOT cause global warming.
Cimate Fraud Whistleblower Rewards Program
Why is handling the massive scientific disagreement with the AGW(Anthropogenic Global Warming = (man caused) proponents crucial to disconnecting Earth's Anti-Matter debt?
Our leaders and thus most of you will not seek the truth about our real place in the universe. Why is explained by ignorance and self service. Until our society openly deals with this easy to resolve scientific disagreement, I must conclude we will not act to prevent Earth from being vaporized.
These links deal directly with How to Prevent our Sun from exploding.
How do we prevent our Sun from exploding July 16, 2024
How to find the two conjunction asteroids shown in the "Missing Earth" crop circle.
This math is required.
How to use a circle to relate 'e' to Phi.
Confirming objective reports.
National UFO Reporting Center
Crop Circle Connector
2-4-2017 Needed A-M debt Disconnection Tools, Measurements & Must Do's
HOW can we get these tests DONE?
The Latest Changes Made To Site
We have received8093361
page views since
April 27, 2005