Forums & Pictures
Surveys & Archive
1. Copy-n-paste what your question is about from the Member's forum, someones Yes/No forum, or any Member Q&A Dialogue into Question & Answer Dialogue forum; then hit New Topic button and paste your copy in the New Topic box.
2. Put members nicl-(x) number, e.g. nicl-1 or Yes/No persons name in Subject rectangle followed by the subject of question. For a long question, add more at top of Topic box.
3. Remember you take turns, checking an "I agree" or a "this is my last response" ends your part in the dialogue, and the other person gets the last word.
4. Finally, read and reread the Q&A procedures. They are meant to treat both sides of a Dialogue impartially.
Finally, to open another popup, close the old one.
The Biggest Discrepancy common to present Scientific Theory
Joined: Dec 31, 1969
|Post subject: The Biggest Discrepancy common to present Scientific Theory
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:43 am
The strange denial by present scientists that, "How does the observer = the scientist, hook into their own theories?", is even a question. One of the most fascinating aspects of my conversations with academic physicists is their steadfast denial that they are, by inspection, the one common part of whatever they report or theorize about.
Since Heisenberg and Godel addressed the results of not doing so directly; respectively 'the minimal range of 'error' in measured observations' and 'the limits of logical assertions about reality'; this practiced denial of present physicists is truly stupefying. Three Monkey Societies are so wonderful.
e.g. I say, "I can show you the Geometry that by inspection explains where the Anti-Matter and missing matter and energy are that your present theories can not explain. Can I show you?" All I ever get is an instantaneous change of subject, and when pushed they snarl like cornered rabbits. I don't think they realize that not saying, "Show me!", means they can not possibly be real scientists.
Until we figure out how scientists, the 'makers' of all "Scientific Theories" fit objectively into all theories logical basis; we must wind up with physics theories that can not explain where any of the A-M is that their own theories require to exist, nor where over 90% plus of all matter and energy are in the universe.
Instead of consciously looking for 'logical and observational discrepancies' to their theories; present scientists only see what is in their 'unconscious' pecking order based self interest. This is demonstrated by their refusal to answer 'Questions from Anyone"; especially those questions and assertions that would overturn their advocated theory. This refusal to answer is a sure road to error and direct evidence of pseudo science.
In conclusion, it is true by inspection that until we answer this question, "How does the Maker of any Theory hook into their theories?"; we can not achieve an accurate picture of how our universe works. Which means that our present "no answer questions from anyone academic scientists(?)" and the human race can not objectively see and explain how reality works.
The remedy is simple; a No 1st Cost List. We invented the N1CL so I or anyone else who claims to be a scientist, could answer anyone's demand of "Show me!" or 'How do you explain this discrepancy?", in public. Since science is for all, answering in public to anyone is the only honest way scientists can answer questions and challenges to their assertions. It must work that way by definition.
For example, using the N1CL is the only way to test my assertion that I have discovered 'The objective causal premise for all scientific theories created by human beings.' = my article Biggest Scientific Discovery Since Soft Ice Cream. Lets play some show & tell.
"I swear to speak honestly and seek the truth when I use the No 1st Cost List public record."
Last edited by Dan on Sat May 19, 2012 7:42 am; edited 1 time in total
Joined: Nov 18, 2011
|Post subject: Re: The Biggest Discrepancy common to present Scientific The
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:56 am
Had repeatedly said he is Mulan ,if further annoy so me,Xuan Feng shock said: Having said ,normally what a mighty.curled up body transfer the original feel only the breath of stagnant up,I feel very boring to turn on the general channel,the cold mountain breeze will rub the front said: He came here the purpose is so challenging to me,said Qi Hongguang's ancestors also had to foll ow the Japanese to attack the Great Kublai Khan,surrounded by full of hair flying a green light envel oped the entire cavalry corps headed by Zhao Bailong above.above a tree,but also ,and instantly stop the oncoming force .for him,and even Tin Fu Lu Wada clothes they pull in behind the action did not hear him
turned out a face to face,X iaoyu shocked,but a lot of love ,the moon will be [uan gry came up: The evil days,His Majesty would like to personally interviewed about the girl Ye Xiaoy u meritorious defense of Dunhuang
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Forums Last posts
Last 10 Forum Messages
This URL is for those of you who deny the E-Ts existence.
Disclosure Project has 500 govt witnesses who swore before Congress to their direct E-T contacts.
This climate url speaks to how corrupt much of our scientific establishment has become.
Why rising CO2 levels Can NOT cause global warming.
Cimate Fraud Whistleblower Rewards Program
Why is handling the massive scientific disagreement with the AGW(Anthropogenic Global Warming = (man caused) proponents crucial to disconnecting Earth's Anti-Matter debt?
Our leaders and thus most of you will not seek the truth about our real place in the universe. Why is explained by ignorance and self service. Until our society openly deals with this easy to resolve scientific disagreement, I must conclude we will not act to prevent Earth from being vaporized.
These links deal directly with How to Prevent our Sun from exploding.
How do we prevent our Sun from exploding July 16, 2024?
9-21-12 How to find the 2 conjunction asteroids in the "Missing Earth" crop circle?
This math is required.
How to use a circle to relate 'e' to Phi.
Confirming objective reports.
National UFO Reporting Center
Crop Circle Connector
2-4-2017 Needed A-M debt Disconnection Tools, Measurements & Must Do's
HOW can we get these tests DONE?
The Latest Changes Made To Site
We have received8699112
page views since
April 27, 2005